Kent Debating Society

Latest Updates: drugs RSS

• 

  THW Legalise Drugs

  Oliver Blackley 1:59 pm on October 10, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
  Tags: 2010 (5), debate (36), drugs, legalise (3), Proposition 19

  Thanks to everyone who turned up to our open debate this Wednesday with Julian Brazier MP, Owen Lyne (UCU) and Usman Ali (NUS) on the topic of funding for higher education. We heard strong arguments from all three panellists, and the MP for Canterbury and Whitstable used the opportunity to announce that he is not in favour of a rise in tuition fees. A high turnout and questions from an engaged audience made for a successful evening, and we hope to run similar events in the near future.

  Next week, we return to our standard format of debating in Keynes Lecture Theatre 5. This week’s motion is one that is given particular relevance by the upcoming vote on Proposition 19 in California: This House Would Legalise Drugs. This is a tricky one for the Proposition to get right, as an excellent definition is needed from the first half of the table. (For example, should the law allow for the limited sale of ‘soft drugs’, or should it let you pick up a line of cocaine from your local off-license?) If you’re interested in speaking drop us an email and we’ll reserve you a slot.

  Also, be sure to buy your membership here, as we’ll be handing out our Beginner’s Guide to Debating to all members this week.

  I hope that the start of the new academic year has treated you all well so far, and I hope to see you on Wednesday!

   

  Reply Click here to cancel reply.

  You must be logged in to post a comment.

• 

  THW Decriminalise Drugs: The result!

  Tom Barker 4:38 pm on October 4, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
  Tags: debate (36), decriminialise, drugs, illicit

  

  Congratulations to the opposition for successfully opposing the decriminalisation of drugs. We were pleased to see the standard begin its assent as you all continue to get the hang of the formalities involved.

  I feel the opposition won not because they produced an exceptionally better case forward but because the proposition failed to explain and demonstrate clearly why decriminalisation was necessary. Call it the proposition’s burden of proof!

  What the proposition needed to do was attain the moral highground on the key issues of this debate, mainly the importance of freedom of choice and the improvements to healthcare. These are the moral arguments. It is important in debates where the proposition can seem to be pursuing an immoral objective to take advantage of the fact they get to speak first and assume the ‘moral highground’. In this case it would have been to show that freedom of choice is important to avoid the slip into a ‘nanny state’ and that decriminalisation is for the benefit of the drug abusers themselves. Unfortunately the highground was left unassumed for the Opp to take and it was always going to be difficult to retain this position afterwards.

  Individually, there were some pleasing speeches. Vish’s expertise and experience shone through to win the best speaker prize, he provided a great demonstration of the kind of authority and conviction I had been talking about during the beginner workshop. This is something we will work on again next week as we feel you are all far too polite at the moment when it comes to the exchange of Points of Information!

  Although all the speakers received glowing feedback from myself and Ben, I feel it appropriate to reiterate that we have been left feeling very optimistic about the future of debating at Kent. The focus of criticism has been upon adapting to the format and conventions of competitive debating and this is easy to learn and develop. What isn’t easy to teach is style and delivery (almost the ‘X Factor’ of debating: you’ve either got it or you haven’t!) something that you all have demonstrated so far and something that we have been unable to really find fault with.

  Next Wednesday the motion is ‘THW send their child to state school’ and will take place after our weekly skills workshop titled ‘Developing a mean streak’. Stay tuned for further details on the debate as well as a preview/research guide to the debate next week.

  Look forward to seeing you all then!

  Tom